Blog and News

USSA Position Paper

Beverly Altimore - Monday, April 08, 2013

Low Sulfur Charge

One way that the Ocean Carrier segment of the shipping industry tries to keep customers happy with low rates while maintaining their own profitability involves finding new ways to enhance their revenues without asking their customers for a rate increase.  They can sometimes accomplish this by applying surcharges to the base ocean freight rate, which promotes the idea of transparency in rating.  Carriers are recently approaching customers with a new surcharge request - the Low Sulfur Charge (LSC).  Carriers advise that the surcharge is applicable due to mandatory international regulations that Carriers burn low sulfur fuels (LSF) when within a certain distance of specified coast lines.  USSA has studied this issue carefully, and while we agree that there are regulations in place requiring the burning of special fuels, we contend that the Carriers unfairly assess this charge against certain segments of the U.S. shipping trade, which then causes those shippers to pay an unfairly high amount.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO), a United Nations agency concerned with maritime safety, security, and pollution-prevention issues, first adopted standards for pollutants in October 2008.  Those standards can be found in the International Convention on the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Annex VI.  That document deems certain coastal areas as Emission Control Areas (ECA), which are special protection areas that qualify for more stringent controls on sulphur oxide (SOx) emissions.  Such areas are requested to be so designated by the governing nations and status as an ECA is achieved through a detailed application process. Additional areas will likely be added over time, but the current ECAs include:


Effective date

Baltic Sea

19 May 2006

North Sea

22 November 2007

North America

1 August 2012

U.S. Caribbean

1 January 2014

Once designated as an ECA, MARPOL assists in setting restrictions on the sulphur content of the fuel that is burned within those areas.  That level can and will fluctuate over time, as necessary, to achieve the environmental standards of each area.  Currently, the requirement is that vessels within the ECA must burn fuel with maximum 1% sulphur content.

The area encompassed by an ECA varies depending on the location.  The current restriction covers some 200 miles from the coast of U.S. and Canada, but the Baltic/North Sea area covers everything within certain geographical lines.

Trying to get a fix on the exact cost of LSF to justify the Carriers’ statement that they are burdened with an additional cost to their operations because of international regulations is difficult.  Although several organizations have developed bunker fuel cost tables to comply with the need to track the price of bunker fuels, LSF is still a new requirement and there are neither adequate tracking systems easily available nor are there precise burn rates.  The TSA/WTSA have established a tracking mechanism for the cost of LSF on their website, but keep in mind that this is information provided by an organization supporting the Carrier community and thus is probably not entirely unbiased in their calculations.

The discrepancy with the LSC being requested by Carriers stems from the fact that this charge is not being evenly and fairly assessed across all users.  General cargoes to and from the U.S. are assessed the LSC by tariff quantum (or possibly special contract rates), but certain low-rated commodities aboard the ship do not pay the LSC charge.  Waste paper and forest products, for example, do not pay LSC.  It can be argued by Carriers that the rates for those products already include the LSC, but the rate levels for those commodities have not recently increased by the quantum of the tariff LSC.  

Additionally, the LSC does not appear on trade lanes not touching the U.S., even though they are destined to areas (like the Baltic and North Sea) that do require the use of low-sulphur fuel.  Likewise, importers from Central and South America do not pay the LSC, either, even though the vessels carrying those goods have the same LSF cost factors as vessels coming from Asia and Europe.

These peculiarities in the application of the LSC should give pause to importers and exporters in the U.S. east-west trade lanes, who should be asking their Carriers not only why they need to pay extra to compensate for this special fuel requirement, but also why they are subsidizing other commodity sectors and also subsidizing shippers in other trades that do not pay it.  

An additional cost to the ship operator is a valid reason to pass on that cost to the user.  It is acknowledged that the end user ultimately always pays the cost of doing business.  With that being said, though, all shippers should pay the cost, not just specific categories of shippers that are somehow considered to be ‘less cost-conscious’.  Cargo interests in the U.S. that pay the LSC are apparently subsidizing not only other U.S. shippers, but shippers to/from Central and South America and importers in Europe, as well.  We contend that if the LSC is applicable, it should be applied equally and fairly across all shipping segments, both in the U.S. and in Europe.  If this additional cost was truly applied fairly and equally across all users, the cost of the charge would go down dramatically for every container moved.   Thus, we ask all Carriers to re-evaluate their LSC – if they intend to assess this charge, it should be done on all applicable trade lanes and on all cargoes moving on the vessel.  Doing so will result in a sizeable reduction of the current requested LSC.  A select group of users in one location should not bear the full cost of this regulation for world-wide operations.

Jerilyn Lorenc commented on 11-Jan-2017 02:14 AM commented on 25-Jan-2017 09:31 AM
Unifߋrmity frоm the sсhedule is extremely important for
avoidance of accidentѕ. Therapy as well as biofeedbacҝ techniques have actually boosted results in obtɑining dіgestive tract continence in some toddler wіth myelomeningocele.
Carrol Ireton commented on 08-Feb-2017 05:59 AM
Our Team is the best staffing agency. We care about quality of our staffing, not about quantity. -
drug store commented on 11-Feb-2017 04:03 PM
If some one desires expert view on the topic of running a blog afterward i recommend him/her to go to see this web site, Keep up the fastidious work.
mumbai commented on 11-Feb-2017 04:14 PM
Excellent post! We are linking to this particularly great content on our site. Keep up the good writing.
sex facebook free commented on 13-Feb-2017 03:34 AM
we go in order to find out every day several sites plus websites
to read through reports, apart from this specific weblog provides quality mainly
based content.
netprecos.Com commented on 15-Feb-2017 03:56 PM
We're a group of volunteers and opening a new scheme in our community.
Your website provided us with valuable information to work
on. You've done a formidable job and our entire community will be grateful to you.
masennus commented on 16-Feb-2017 07:50 AM
Wow that was unusual. I just wrote an extremely long
comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn't show up.
Grrrr... well I'm not writing all that over again. Anyhow, just wanted to
say fantastic blog!
masennus commented on 21-Feb-2017 12:45 AM
of course like your web-site but you need to check
the spelling on several of your posts. Many of them are rife
with spelling problems and I to find it very bothersome
to tell the reality however I'll definitely come back
Alexander von commented on 26-Feb-2017 05:42 PM
Cooler Artikel. +1
Giuseppe Hylands commented on 09-Mar-2017 05:02 PM
Great article!
4DFX commented on 10-Mar-2017 09:50 PM
















Lavinia Konderla commented on 22-Mar-2017 01:48 AM
Really Great list and I find useful information about how WordPress helps to build the big brands on the internet. Before reading this article I’m not aware of using WordPress CMS for big enterprises. But now I will recommend to my big enterprise clients.
Versicherung Drohne commented on 27-Mar-2017 10:19 AM
Jetzt Versicherung Drohne kaufen. Die preiswerteste Versicherung Drohne von den Koelner Maklern Beckersjürgen und Khalidi.
reverse phone lookup commented on 03-Apr-2017 02:07 PM
cell phone lookup free by name reverse free cell phone lookup cell phone number owner lookup free lookup a cell phone number by name for free
Ernie commented on 14-Apr-2017 12:31 PM
Thanks for that magnificent write-up, nice site to!
It makes be waant to get a weblog. What software do
you have to get started? I hear a good deql about this WordPress?!!
Noreen commented on 24-Apr-2017 09:20 AM
Thanks for sharing this great webpage.

Also visit my web-site ::m88 link alternatif
adult toy review commented on 24-Apr-2017 01:51 PM
These are genuinely enormous ideas in regarding blogging.
You have touched some nice factors here. Any way keep
up wrinting.
Genia commented on 24-Apr-2017 10:21 PM
thank a lot for your site it helps a great deal.

Feel free to visit my web sitem88a
Shanon commented on 25-Apr-2017 01:01 AM
Wow because this is excellent job! Congrats and keep it up.

Also visit my blog postm88
M88 commented on 08-May-2017 10:43 AM
Hi, I do think this is a great site. I stumbledupon it ;) I'm going to return yet again since I book-marked it.
Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to guide others.
M88 commented on 25-May-2017 03:21 PM
Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in reality used to be a amusement
account it. Look advanced to more delivered agreeable from you!

By the way, how could we communicate?
M88 commented on 09-Jun-2017 03:04 AM
Whats up are using Wordpress for your blog platform? I'm new to the blog world but I'm trying to get
started and create my own. Do you need any html coding expertise to
make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Post a Comment

Captcha Image

Trackback Link
Post has no trackbacks.

Our Carriers